Kaiser Diagnostic and
Treatment
Documents
NOVEMBER 1999 KAISER PERMANENTE
CLINICAL PRACTICE
STATEMENT for ADULT SEPSIS ENDORSED BY:
CHIEFS OF CRITICAL CARE
CHIEFS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
CHIEFS OF MEDICINE
CHIEFS OF SURGERY
HBS PEER GROUP
REGIONAL CHAIRS OF PULMONARY
MEDICINE SUB-CHIEFS
OF INFECTIOUS
DISEASE GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Prevention of sepsis
is facilitated by: recommending
vaccinations, such as pneumovax and influenza; the appropriate
early treatment of pneumonia,
urinary tract, and other infections; use of sterile precautions;
routine hygiene; and judicious
use of Foley catheters and other invasive devices. See Table I for
conditions leading to high risk
for sepsis. The
early
recognition of sepsis is vital to prevent
disease progression and increased risk of mortality. It is
important to continually monitor
vital signs, urine output and mental status and
to pay close attention to deteriorating
trends. See Table 2 for definitions of different stages of sepsis.
Septic
patients require rapid treatment tuith antibiotics
and fluids. Do not delay antibiotic treatment if
cultures can not be readily obtained.
See Tables 3 and 4 for antimicrobial recommendations and treatment
algorithm.
KAISERPAPERS.INFO
|
Determine advance directives,
patient preferences
for care, and establish code status with a physician order.
These should be documented and
respected at all times,
and treatment plans modified accordingly.
Many
recent studies evaluating innovative
therapies
have failed to show any improvement inpatient outcomes.
Therefore, this clinical
practice statement emphasizes
standard therapies.
TREATMENT
GOALS Attain the
following treatment
goals as rapidly as possible.
See Table 4 for treatment algorithm.
* Systolic blood pressure
³90
mm Hg or MAP ³6 0-70 mm Hg *SaO2
³90% *
Urine output >
0.5cc/kg/hr *
Resolving acidosis *
Improved mental status
The
goal of the
clinical practice statement -
to promote early recognition of sepsis in adults to facilitate early
intervention in order to reduce
morbidity and mortality.
Audience
-
all physicians treating patients in
the hospital and emergency department, hospital and emergency nurses, as well
as physicians and nurse
practitioners seeing patients in the outpatient and urgent care
setting.
Development
-
by a multidisciplinary team of intensivists,
hospital based specialists, emergency
and primary care
physicians, and emergency
and intensive care nurses. Widely reviewed throughout the
Northern California region. To
be reviewed at least every two years and revised as needed.
Foundation
- due to insufficient evidence from
large, randomized, controlled clinical trials, the Statement is based upon
standard practice, expert
opinion, and, when available, well- designed, randomized,
controlled clinical trials. INTRODUCTION
Sepsis is the most common
cause of death in medical/surgical
intensive care units. It occurs at an estimated incidence of
more than 500,000 cases
per year, with mortality rates ranging from 5%-90%, depending
upon severity. The yearly
incidence is increasing due to
multiple factors,
including; the aging of the population,
increased use of invasive procedures
and
immunosuppressive agents, aggressive management
of malignant conditions,
and the emergence
of resistant organisms. Certain
segments of the population are
particularly prone
to developing sepsis.Preventive
measures, such as the pneumovax and influenza
vaccines and limited use of invasive
devices, are vital for these groups. It is especially
important to consider sepsis in any high-risk
patient who meets the criteria for systemic
inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). |
Table
I. Conditions Leading to High Rick for Sepsis
*Age
> 65
*
Chronic liver disease
*Chronic
lung disease
*Chronic
renal disease
*Diabetes
mellitus *Heart
disease *Hematologic
disorder *Immunodeficiency *Indwelling
catheters *Infection
in previous year
*Malignant
neoplasm *Non-cardiac
vascular disease
*Organic
cognitive disorder
*Spinal
cord injury
*Substance
abuse *Adapted
from Quartin,30 Kreger24
ACCM/SCCM
DEFINITION The lack
of clear clinical and
laboratory definitions
for sepsis, and the resulting inconsistency in patient
diagnosis, patient care, and
clinical studies, led the American College of Chest Physicians and the
Society of Critical Care
Medicine (ACCP/SCCM) to
convene a Consensus Conference
in 1991. Its purpose was
to agree on definitions in
order to facilitate early
recognition and therapy.l At the conference, the terms
'sepsis', 'severe sepsis' and 'septic
shock' were defined. Bacteremia, which had been closely
associated with sepsis as a predictor
of poor prognosis, was determined
inessential to
establishing a diagnosis. The
term 'septicemia' was abandoned, and the term systemic
inflammatory
response syndrome (SIRS) was
introduced (Table 2). Systemic
inflammatory response syndrome
is the
term applied to the diffuse inflammatory reaction as a result of any
physiologic insult, such as
trauma, bums, pancreatitis,
toxins or infection. Regardless of etiology, SIRS is
manifested by
two or more of the
following symptoms: fever or hypothermia,
tachycardia, tachypnea, and leukocytosis. SIRS involves all organs and
cells, and is triggered
by a host of endogenous inflammatory mediators. Once initiated, the
inflammatory response may
continue even after the inciting
insult has been resolved. Although the SIRS definition is broad, it
should be used to screen
patients who are at risk for
developing sepsis. The
SIRS criteria21,32 have
proved sensitive
for early identification of patients with sepsis. A study of the
history
of
50% - 90% SIRS followed 2527
patients
admitted to the hospital
who met these criteria. Among them, 26% (649) developed
sepsis, 18%
(467) severe sepsis, and
4% (110) septic shock. The
median interval and likelihood of progression to sepsis was related
to the number of SIRS criteria
met on presentation. The
mortality rate increased from 6% if two out of four criteria were met,
to 18% if all
four criteria were
met. The mortality rate
progressed from 7% in SIRS to 46% in septic shock (Table 2).
*The goal is to recognize sepsis as early as
possible
and to initiate therapy immediately.
The progression from
sepsis or severe sepsis to septic
shocky with its increased mortality, may be prevented by the
early initiation of appropriate antibiotic
therapy. *A
patient can progress rapidly from sepsis to
septic
shock even when treated appropriately. |
| Term |
Definition |
Predicted
Mortality Rate | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) | At least 2 of the following:
*Hypothermia <
96.1°F* *Body
temperature > IO1°
F
(Note: tympanic temperature may be unreliable)
*Tachypnea (respiration
> 20 breaths/min
or minute
ventilation > 10 L/min) *Tachycardia ( >
90 beats/min) *WBC
>12K cells/3
or < 4Kcells/mm3
or > lO% band |
5% -
10% | | Sepsis | SIRS plus clinical evidence of any
infection that could
lead to rapid & significant
physiological deterioration (as
in severe sepsis or
septic shock) | 5%
- 16% | | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis plus altered organ per fusion with
at least one of the
following: *Acute
mental status
change** *Hypoxia
(PO2
< 60 mm Hg on room air) *Increased lactic acid
or metabolic acidosis
Oliguria
< 0.5 cc/kg/hr | 20% - 25% |
| Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis with hypotension:
*Systolic BP < 90
mm Hg or drop in MAP
> 40 mm from
baseline *Responsive
to IV fluids
and pressors | 25% - 50% |
| Refractory Septic Shock | Septic shock which: *Does not respond to
initial fluids *Requires
high doses of
pressors | 40% - 60% |
| Multiple-Organ Dysfunction (MOD) |
Altered
organ function
* See Table 6 | 50% - 90% |
|
Adapted from
BoneRC6, Rangel-Frallstd2,
Knaus21, Brun-Buisso9
* Associated with
twice the mortality rate of febrile
patients **
Lethargy, stupor, coma, or
disorientation to person,
place, or time Table
3. Empirical
Choice of Antimicrobial Regimes
for Sepsis |
Unknown Source | Gram
(-) bacilli | ® | Gentamicin
or Tobramycin* (slow IV) 5
mg/kg/dsingle
dose plus
3rd generation cephalosporin |
| Pulmonary |
Strep
pneumoniae, Gram
() bacilli Less
Common: Hemophilus, Anaerobes,
Legionella If
atypical
pneumonia is likely | ®
® |
Cefotaxime
2gmq 8h or
Cefuroxime 750-1500
mgq 8h or
Ceftriaxone 1-2
gm q 24h or
Levofloxadn (NF) 500mgq
24h Add
Azithromycin (NF)500mgq 24h to beta-lactams |
| Urinary | Gram
(-) bacilli Enterococcus |
®
® |
Gentamicin
or Tobramycin* (slow IV) 5 mg/kg/d
single
dose or
Ceftizoxime 1-2
gm q 8h Ampidilin
2gm
q 6h | | Intra-Abdominal |
Gram(-)bacilli.
Anaerobes Enterococcus
| ® ® | Gentamicin
or Tobramycin* (slow IV) 5mg/kg/dsingle
dose plus
Clindamydn 600-900
mgq8h or
Ceftizoxime 1-2 gm q
8h or Cefotetan l'2 gm q 12h plus Metronidazole 500
mgq8h Consider
adding
Ampicillin to all of the above regimens |
Cardiovascular (Endocarditis, IV-cathetev related) | Staph
aureus Strep
species, Gram
(-) bacilli Candida
| ® ® ® | Nafdilin
2 gm q 4-6h or Cefazolin l-2
gm q 8h Gentamicin
or
Tobramycin* (slow IV) l-2mg/kg/d BID
dosing plus
Ampicillin 12 gm/d as q 4-6h or continous
infusion or plus
Penicillin 12-18 Mu/das q 4-6h or continuous
infusion or
plus
Ceftriaxone 2 gm q 24h Fluconazole 400 mg
q 24h or
Amphoteridn B 0.5-1.0 mg/kg q 24h |
| Central Nervous System | Meningitis:
Pneumococci Meningococci
(less
common) Listeria
(less common) Abcess:
Staph, Strop, Gram
(-) bacillli,
Anaerobes | ®
®
® ® | Vancomycin
1 gm q 12h plus
Ceftriaxone 2 gm q 12h until resistance
known Ceftriaxone
2
gm q 12h Ampicillin
2-3
gm q 4h or 18gm/d as continuous infusion
Ceftriaxone 2
gm q 12h plus
Metronidazole 500 mg q 8h |
| Soft Tissue & Skin |
Cellulitis:
Staph aureus Necrotizing
fasditis:
Strep | ®
® |
Cefazolin
l-2 gm q 8h or
Clindamycin 900 gm q 8h Clindamycin 900
gm q 8h plus
Ciprofloxacin 400 mg q 12h |
Neutropenic Patients4 |
Gram
(+) & Gram (-) bacilli Fungi | ® ® | Ceftazidime
l-2 gm q 8h with or without Gentamicin
or
Tobramycin* (slow IV) 5mg/kg/d single loading
dose Fluconazole
400 mg q 24h or
Amphotericin B 0.5-
1.0mg/kg q 24h | |
* Adjust
Gentamicin or Tobramycin dosage for renal
function per pharmacy protocol. Quantities over 200mg should
be given
over at least two hours.
NF
- Not in formulary
I
Not all
scenarios can be covered in this
table. Call the Infectious Disease consultant prn, especially
if
resistant organisms are suspected. Revise medication
immediately
upon receipt of identification and sensitivity results.
2 Choices are not
listed in order of preference.
Discuss with local Infectious Disease consultant prn.
3 May need
adjustment in cases of renal and/or
hepatic dysfunction. 4
For
management of oncology patients with
chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, refer to your local protocol or the
on-line
clinical library. TABLE
4. TREATMENT ALGORITHM
FOR SEPSIS (Systemic
Inflammatory
Response Syndrome with Clinical
Evidence of Potentially Serious Infection) |
ASSESSMENT
& MONITORING |
DIAGNOSTIC
MEASURES | TREATMENT | TREATMENT
GOALS | Evaluate:
*Temperature *Blood pressure *Heart rate *Respiratory
rate *Pulse
oximetry *Mental
status | Determine
source of sepsis and rule out
non-infectious causes (e.g.
pancreatitis,
drugs, toxins): *Cultures:
2 sets of
blood cultures;urine, sputum, CSF
and other sites as
indicated *UA
*CBC *Glucose *Na, K, Cl, HCO3,
Creatinine *12-lead
ECG *Chest X-ray
*Review previous history
of infection Consider:
*Bilirubin and SGPT
*Amylase
*PT/PTT (consider
fibrinogen, D-dimer if indicated) *ABG (if hypoxemia or
metabolic acidosis is present) *Random cortisol level *Urine gram stain Continue search
for source of occult
infection: *Ultrasound
*Spinal tap
*CT scan | Sepsis:
*Antibiotics to treat
expected source,or broad-spectrum
(see Table 3)must be administered immediately
*Maintain hydration
*NPO status until
respiratory & mental status are
stable/improved Severe
sepsis, add: *Rapid
fluid
resuscitation - 1 to 4 liters of isotonic
crystalloids with frequent monitoring of changes in
BP, urine output, SaO2
Frequent clinical
assessment for
complications, such as pulmonary
edema *Supplemental
high dose oxygen to maintain SaO2 ³90%.
Consider intubation
if patient
has signs of respiratory fatigue
or pulmonary edema *Septic
shock, add: *If
adequate
organ perfusion cannot
be rapidly achieved with fluid resuscitation, pressor agents should
be administered,
preferably through a large bore, peripheral
IV or central venous access line | *Systolic
blood pressure ³
90 mm Hg or MAP ³ 60-70 mm Hg
SaO2 ³
90% *Urine
output >
0.5 cc/kg/hr *
Improved mental status |
|
Advance directives,
patient preferences for care and code
status should be determined and documented. The patient or agent's
preferences should be respected
at all times, and treatment modified accordingly
The Next 12 Hours |
ASSESSMENT
* MONITORING |
DIAGNOSTIC
MEASURES | TREATMENT | TREATMENT
GOALS | Frequent monitoring: *Temperature *Urine output *Blood pressure *Mental status *Heart rate *Respiratory rate *Metabolic acidosis *Pulse oximetry Consider: *Arterial line if patient
remains hypotensive on
pressors *Hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheter for selected patients (renal failure, pulmonary edema, fluid status unknown) |
Repeat lab tests to assess
therapy, as
clinically appropriate: *Need for pRBCs *ABG *Check
gram stains, if
available *CBC
*Electrolytes
*BUN *Creatinine *Glucose *K *Lactic
acid/anion gap *DIC
panel | Sepsis: *Continue antibiotics *Maintain hydration Severe
sepsis/Septic shock, add: *Up to 10 liters of
crystalloids (and up to 1 liter
of colloids if necessary) in first 24 hours (for shock/hypoperfusion) to
achieve treatment goals
*Continue infusion of
pressors to achieve treatment goals General
measures: *Stress
ulcer prophylaxis *DVT
prophylaxis For
persistent
hypotension: *Consider
adrenal
insufficiency *Is
the patient being
treated with calcium channel blockers
or other hypotensive medications?
*Consider early
intubation for respiratory distress
or impending
failure. | *Systolic blood pressure ³90 mm Hg or MAP³ 60-70 mm Hg
Sa022
³ 90% *Urine
output >
0.5cc/kg/hr *Improved
mental status *Acidosis
resolving | |
| Subsequent Care |
ASSESSMENT
& MONITORING |
DIAGNOSTIC
MEASURES | TREATMENT | |
Reassess
all clinical parameters
as before, and determine
if patient is
at appropriate
level of
care. Evaluate
complications of therapy,
e.g.: *ATN
*Pulmonary edema
*Altered mental status
*Hypotension |
Continue
to monitor for clinical stability
&
organ function: *CBC
*Electrolytes/anion g ap
*BUN *Creatinine *Glucose *SGPT, bilirubin *Mg and K *DIC panel, as
appropriate *ABG,
as appropriate Consider:
*Hemodynamic monitoring
with pulmonary
artery
catheter for selected
patients (renal
failure, pulmonary
edema, fluid
status unknown) |
Ongoing support of organ function:
*Maintain
fluids to support resuscitation goals, e.g. blood
products *Dialysis
*Ventilator support
Re-evaluation of
antibiotic therapy based on culture
results Resume
patient's regular
medications, as appropriate
General
measures: *Nutrition
*DVT prophylaxis
*Stress ulcer prophylaxis
*Psychosocial support
*Physical therapy
*Discharge planning
| TREATMENT
GOALS *Systolic
blood
pressure ³
90 mm Hg or MAP³
60-70 mm Hg SaO2
³
90% *Urine
output
> 0.5 cc/kg/hr *Improved
mental status *Acidosis
resolving |
|
Advance directives'
patient preferences for care and code
status should be determined and documented, The patient or agent's
preferences should be respected
at all times, and treatment modified accordingly. Hebert 16
Knaus21, Herbert17,
Bakker3, Hayes15
DIAGNOSIS &
TREATMENT
Sepsis
has myriad
clinical manifestations. The goal is
to recognize sepsis as early as possible and to initiate therapy
immediately. See Table I for
groups at high risk for sepsis.
The progression from sepsis or
severe sepsis to septic
shock, with its increased mortality, may be prevented by the early
initiation of appropriate antibiotic
therapy. Frequently, sepsis
does not have a source
that can be quickly identified.
In that case, broad spectrum antibiotic coverage for both
Gram negative and Gram positive
organisms is recommended in the
initial hospital course.
Antibiotic therapy may need
to be adjusted according to additional
information
obtained in the course of hospitalization.
Cultures of blood,
and other appropriate sources, such
as urine and sputum, or of spinal,
peritoneal, pleural,
or joint fluids, should
be obtained rapidly, preferably before the institution of antibiotic
therapy. However, therapy
must not be delayed if cultures cannot be rapidly
obtained. It is also important
to obtain baseline tests of organ function for future comparison
in the event of organ
dysfunction (Table 6). If initial evaluation does not reveal the
source of sepsis, continue
to search for an occult source, such as sub-acute endocarditis or
intra-abdominal process.
Septic patients may
not be febrile, and may be hypothermic. The
absence of a fever does not rule out sepsis and
may, infact, portend a poorer
prognosis. Patients may be afebrile because of unappreciated
antipyretic use prior to presentation.
In
the patient with severe sepsis, initiate fluids
and antibiotics as rapidly as possible. A
patient can progress quickly from sepsis
to septic shock even when treated
appropriately.
Antibiotics
Early institution of
empiric antibiotic therapy is of
great importance in the management of sepsis (Table 3). When
choosing initial antibiotics,
consider factors such as the presumed site of infection and
the likelihood of nosocomial
infection with resistant species. Pulmonary infections are the
most common source, followed
by genitourinary and gastro-intestinal, depending upon the
population. Empiric
antibiotic
therapy for septic shock usually includes
multiple drugs. Advantages include
a greater likelihood
of antibiotic coverage against
the infecting agent, prevention
of the emergence of
resistant strains, and
possible synergistic antibacterial activity of some combinations.
The disadvantages include
increased risk of toxicity, super-infection
with
opportunistic organisms (e.g. fungi),
and possible antagonism of antibacterial
activity. In
addition to
antimicrobial therapy, measures to eliminate
the source of infection should be pursued. Abscess cavities must
be drained and intravascular
devices or surgical prosthetic materials that are potential
sources of infection may
need to be removed. Patients
with hypotension and hypoperfusion may require as much as 10
liters of isotonic crystalloid
fluids and
I liter of
colloids in the first 24 hours of resuscitation. Fluid
Resuscitation Fluid
resuscitation is the
first step in the management
of hypotension/hypoperfusion due to sepsis. Hypovolemia is
a common problem as result
of vasodilation, capillary leak,
poor intake and
increased insensible fluid losses.
The goals of therapy are to achieve a systolic blood pressure ³
90 mm Hg, a heart rate of < 110 beats/min, and improvement in
mental status and urine
output. Patients with severe
sepsis/shock may need large volumes of fluid to correct
deficits. In the first 24
hours of resuscitation, as much as 10 liters of isotonic crystalloid fluids
(normal saline or Ringer's
lactate) and 1 liter of colloids may be required.31,35
Fluids should be delivered
through two large-bore peripheral IVs or a venous access central line as
quickly as possible. Continue
to monitor vital signs, urine
output and mental status
to assure that treatment
goals are attained. 18
CRYSTALLOIDS
& COLLOIDS
Multiple studies have
shown that patients in septic shock
may be resuscitated with crystalloids,
with or without
colloid solutions. These
studies show no significant difference in mortality rates using colloids
compared with crystalloids
as long as appropriate resuscitation goals are reached.
10,34 Crystalloid fluids
are preferred for resuscitation.
If resuscitation
goals are not achieved after 4-6 liters
of crystalloids, some clinicians add colloids. Studies have shown
that adding colloids will
increase blood pressure and cardiac
index more rapidly and
with less volume than
crystalloids alone. This is crucial,
since leaving the
patient with persistent hypotension
and hypoperfusion will result
in multiple organ
dysfunction and higher mortality.
Larger, well-designed, randomized
trials will be
required to detect potentially
small differences in treatment effects, mortality, and
pulmonary function, if they truly
exist. Hetastarch
(Hespanâ)
and albumin are the most commonly used colloids. Colloid resuscitation can be initiated
with a bolus of 250
cc of hetastarch, and repeated as needed.31
This is as effective as albumin and
may have fewer adverse effects.l4 Fresh frozen
plasma is useful if the
patient has coagulopathy (e.g.
INR > 2).
While
aggressive fluid resuscitation may lead to pulmonary
edema, this concern should not
dissuade physicians from using
large amounts
of IV fluids
when organ hypoperfusion is present.
Patients
with rales, decreasing oxygen or increased
respiratory rate should have a chest x-ray.
Fluid resuscitation
should not be discontinued unless
the x-ray reveals pulmonary edema in the presence
of worsening respiratory failure.
RED BLOOD CELL COUNT
The minimum
maintenance range for hemoglobin in critical
care patients is thought to
be 7-9 gm/dL after
considering blood flow, oxygen
delivery and coronary ischemia. For patients with signs of
hypoperfusion, coronary disease
or bleeding, hemoglobin may need to be maintained at a higher
level. 17 Code Status &
Advance Directives Sepsis
treatment may require
the use of mechanical ventilation
and pressor agents. These
aggressive measures are
used in refractory septic
shock, which has a predicted mortality of 40%-60%, and in
multiple organ dysfunction,
with a predicted mortality of 50%-90%. The patient's wishes
regarding code status,
mechanical ventilation, the use of pressors and other treatments
should be discussed in
the context of the diagnosis of sepsis and existing
comorbidities. They should
be reviewed with the patient or agent (in cases of altered mental
status), written in the orders
and respected throughout treatment. Vasopressors When hypotension is not
rapidly reversed by adequate
fluid resuscitation, vasopressors or inotropic drugs should be
initiated (Table 5). Infusion
through a large-bore IV or central access venous line is
preferred. Dopamine is the initial
vasopressor of choice and should be titrated to a maximum of 10 to
20 mcg/kg/min. Norepinephrine
should be employed early in the course
of shock if dopamine is
ineffective. Once norepinephrine
is started, dopamine should be rapidly reduced to a renal
dose of < 2 mcg/kg/min
(Table 5). If
the patient
remains hypotensive after aggressive resuscitation
with fluids and pressors,
evaluate
prescription medications taken within
the last 24 hours. Withold any medications which may impact
blood pressure (e.g. calcium
channel blockers, beta blockers, ACE inhibitors) until the
patient is hemodynamically
stable. Adrenal
Insufficiency Adrenal
insufficiency
should be considered in patients
with septic shock who do not respond to fluids and
pressors.36 It
is thought to occur in 30%-40% of critically ill
patients, but can be easily
overlooked. Adrenal failure/insufficiency
or hemorrhage is found on
autopsy in 30%-50% of
patients in refractory septic
shock. It is vital that physicians be aware
that this is a treatable
component of shock. The classic
laboratory features of hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and
acidosis are often absent, and
should not be relied upon.
Since the use of short-duration stress-dose steroids is safe,
it is advisable to over-suspect
and treat, rather than miss this diagnosis.28
If the patient has
hypotension that is refractory to fluids
and pressors, a random cortisol level should be drawn, and the
patient started on a stress
dose of hydrocortisone (300-400 mg/d) until the random cortisol
level is available. The ACTH
(cosyntropin) test is not required in an emergency situation. Studies have documented that
patients with normal adrenal
function under stress, such as surgery, sepsis or
hypotension, will have random cortisol
levels > 20 mcg/dL. If the random level is < 20,
steroids should be continued,
as adrenal failure is likely. |
| AGENT | USUAL DOSE | COMMENTS |
| Dopamine | 2.0 mcg/kg/min; titrated to
maximum dose of 20
mcg/kg/min | Initial agent recommended by most
dinicians for
management of septic shock.ls Avoid during coronary
ischemia if possible. May cause
angina or tachycardia, or increase
likelihood of
infarction | | Norepinephrine | 0.05 mcg/kg/min; increase to
0.5 mcg/kg/min | Usually effective in raising BP in patients with
septic
shock who have not responded to fluids and dopamine.13
Consider if patient isnot responding to 10-20 mcg/kg/min of dopamine15,25
or suffers from excessive tachycardia. Use of low-dose
dopamine concurrently
with norepinephrine may helppreserve renal perfusion and urine output.33 |
| Epinephrine | 0.1 mcg/kg/min; increase to
0.5 mcg/kg/min |
In high doses produces increase in cardiac output
and
BP, even in patients who do not respond to norepinephrine. Increases
heart
rate and myocardial oxygen consumption;
may
precipitate myocardial ischemia. Must
be used with care, particularly
in older
patients. | Dobutamine2
(for use in the ICU
only, with hemodynamic
monitoring) | 2 mcg/kg/min; increase to
20 mcg/kg/min | May improve
myocardial performance and oxygen delivery in septic shock. May cause
beta-adrenergically mediated vasodilation; may worsen hypotension
caused by decrease in systemic vascular resistance. Likely to be most
beneficial in patients whose cardiac output is not elevated (cardiac
index < 2.8 liters) and who have low oxygen delivery 800 ml/min)
and lactic acidosis.15 Should be used only if SBP is > 90 mm Hg. |
|
Titrated to achieve
MAP³
60-70 mm Hg Titrated
to achieve
MAP³
60-70 mm Hg and cardiac index > 2.8 liters
Even in the absence
of adrenal failure, a significant
improvement in hemodynamics and
a trend towards improved
28-day mortality have been
documented in recent studies using hydrocortisone. The patients
with pressor-dependent septic
shock were administered modest
doses of hydrocortisone
for a mean of > 96 hours.5,8The
dosage used in the first 24 hours
was a 100 mg
hydrocortisone IV bolus, plus a continuous
IV infusion of 200-300 mg over
24h. These studies
reflect that, in the setting
of pressor-dependent septic shock, this
dosage of hydrocortisone
should be strongly considered
and administered for 3-5 days. This
practice is in strong contrast to previous use
of high-dosage corticosteroid. (two grams
of methylprednisolone).
Several studies have shown that
the use of high-dose corticosteroids results in higher mortality,
and currently is not advised. 7,37
Hemodynamic Monitoring
(Pulmonary Artery Catheter)
If the patient shows evidence
of persistent hypoperfusion
after adequate fluid resuscitation
and pressor
agents have not achieved resuscitation
goals, then hemodynamic
monitoring should
be considered. In the presence
of coronary disease,
renal dysfunction or
pulmonary edema, hemodynamic
monitoring may be required
to guide further
titration of fluids and pressors.26
There is ongoing debate about the value of this procedure, since
no clinical studies have
shown that the use of pulmonary artery catheters has improved
patient outcomes.12
Therefore, they should be used in appropriately selected
patients and managed by an experienced
team of critical care physicians and nurses.29
Treatment with inotropes to
increase cardiac output and oxygen delivery to
supra-normal levels has not
been shown to improve outcomes. 5
In the presence of hemodynamic
monitoring, the treatment goals should
be MAP ³60-70 mm Hg and
cardiac index
> 2.8 liters. CLINICAL
MANIFESTATIONS Mental
Status Altered
mental status due to
sepsis encephalopathy is
more common in elderly patients
and is associated
with more than twice the mortality.
Therefore, sedation or narcotics should be avoided as much as
possible in sepsis patients,
in order to aid diagnosis. Hypothermia Hypothermia is found in 9%-13%
of patients and especially
in the elderly. The methyl- prednisolone
sepsis study 11
found a higher
failure to recover from shock (66% vs. 26%) and more than twice the
mortality rate (62% vs. 26%)
in hypothermic patients (< 96°
F) when compared
with febrile
patients. Pulmonary
Manifestations The
earliest pulmonary
responses are tachypnea and respiratory
alkalosis, which are probably
caused by the
mediators of sepsis. Subsequent
ventilation-perfusion mismatch frequently results in
hypoxemia with a normal chest x-ray.
As sepsis progresses, capillary leak/edema with increasing
shunt, airway resistance,
and dead space also contribute to ventilatory failure and
hypoxemia. In addition, fever,
shivering and increased carbon dioxide production lead to
very high minute ventilation
demands in sepsis, SIRS, or acute respiratory distress syndrome
(ARDS) patients.20 The metabolic
acidosis and increased minute ventilation
of sepsis place a very high demand on the respiratory pump (i.e.
the diaphragm and intercostal
muscles). These muscles have a limited ability to meet the
ventilatory demand because
of poor perfusion, hypoxemia. acidosis, and electrolyte
imbalance. Studies have shown
muscle contractile force to be reduced by 20%-30% in sepsis.19
As sepsis
progresses, respiratory muscle fatigue occurs rapidly and results in
respiratory acidosis and eventual
arrest. Therefore, early intervention with endotracheal intubation
and mechanical ventilation
is very important. It
is crucial to
review the patient or agent's preferences
for aggressive treatment and to document code status as the
clinical situation and
prognosis evolve. Mechanical
Ventilation The
recognition of respiratory
acidosis and impending
respiratory failure in a patient with metabolic acidosis is
important and may be easily overlooked.
In simple metabolic acidosis,
the respiratory
compensation results in low
pCO2. As the respiratory pump fatigues,
the pCO2,
rises, signaling imminent respiratory
arrest. Calculate the predicted 2, in simple
acidosis by either
of the methods listed in the
box below.*27 If the pCO2
on arterial blood gas measurements
is higher than the calculated pCO2
the patient is showing evidence of respiratory
muscle pump fatigue. Most likely,
the patient needs
intubation and mechanical ventilation,
particularly if the fatigue
is associated with
altered mental status, tachypnea,
or hypoxemia. Non- invasive
mechanical
ventilation (BiPAP) in patients with
respiratory failure due to sepsis/ARDS
is not indicated,
and delaying endotracheal
intubation may result in a poor outcome. These patients should
be kept on NPO status
until respiratory and mental status are stable or improved.
Calculation of Predicted CO2 |
Expected pCO2:
a. [(Measured HCO3
x 1.5)+8] ± 2 OR
b. ³ the
last
2 digits of the pH Example
of ABG showing
respiratory muscle fatigue pH
= 7.20, measured pCO2=
28, measured serum
HCO3 = 8 [8 x 1.5]+8
±
2 = 20 ± 2 Thus,
the expected pCO 2should
be from 18-22. Since
the measured pCO2
= 28, this patient
has both respiratory acidosis and metabolic acidosis. *These formulae do not apply
to patients with chronic
CO, retention. |
Multiple Organ
Dysfunction (MOD) CONTACT INFORMATION Kaiser Permanente Northern
California TPMG
Department of Quality and
Utilization 1800
Harrison Street, 4th floor Oakland,
CA 94612 510-987-2950
or tie-line
8-427-2950 To
obtain more information
about KPNC Clinical Practice
Guidelines and Statements, printed copies. or permission to reproduce any
portion, please contact
the TPMG Dept. of Quality & Utilization, or
send an e-mail message to
clil.EiC.l~l.gzlidelilzes@kp.
org KPNC
Clinical Practice
Guidelines and Statements can
be viewed on-line on the
Kaiser Permanente Northern
California intranet
website at htt{)://clinical
'library, ca.
kp. org CME
Credit: ContinumH
Education Credit for physicians
and nurses is
available for review ol Statement.
The CME Pro- and
Post-Tests are available
on-line at the above
website address. This
website is accessible
only from the Kaiser Permanente computer
network. The
Permanente Medical Group
(TPMG) clinical practice
guidelines and statements have been developed to assist clinicians by
providing an analytical framework
for the evaluation and treatment of selected common problems encountered by
patients. These guidelines
and statements are not intended to establish a protocol for all patients
with a particular condition.
While they provide one approach to evaluating a
problem, clinical conditions
may vary significantly from
individual to individual. Therefore, the clinician
must exercise independent
judgment and make decisions
based upon the situation presented. While great care has been taken to
assure the accuracy of the
information presented, the reader is advised that TPMG
cannot be responsible for
continued currency of the information for any errors or omissions in
this statement, or for
any consequences arising from their use. Copyripht 1999 The Permanente
Medical Group, Inc. Rapid
and appropriate
resuscitation in shock is important
to prevent multiple organ dysfunction
(see Table 6 for
criteria). The etiology
of MOD is very complex and not yet clearly understood. A
patient's prognosis is related
to age and the number of organ systems involved. The average
risk of death increases
by 20 percent with the failure of each additional organ system.22,16
Several studies have
shown4,9,21,32
that mortality was 30-40%
with single organ dysfunction, greater than 60% with two dysfunctional
systems and more than 90%
in patients with three or more dysfunctional systems. DISCHARGE EVALUATION Once the patient has responded
to treatmen and his/her
vital signs have stabilized, plans for discharge should be
initiated. The patient may be
discharged to the home, to home health care, or to a skilled
nursing facility. The
following should
be evident before patient discharge
is considered: *Temperature
normal or
normalizing *White
blood cell count
returning to normal *Respiration
rate at or near
baseline *Q2
,
saturation ³
90% with or without oxygen or at baseline *Pneumococcal and influenza
vaccine given, as appropriate
Table 6. Criteria for Organ System Dysfunction |
Respirator
Dysfunction or
Acute Lung Injury | All
of the following: *
Chest X-ray bilateral
infiltrates CONTACT
INFORMATION Kaiser
Permanente
Northern California TPMG
Department of
Quality and Utilization 1800
Harrison Street,
4th floor Oakland,
CA 94612 510-987-2950
or tie-line
8-427-2950 To
obtain more
information about KPNC Clinical Practice
Guidelines and Statements, printed copies. or permission to
reproduce any portion, please contact
the TPMG Dept. of Quality & Utilization, or
send an e-mail message
to clil.EiC.l~l.gzlidelilzes@kp.
org KPNC
Clinical Practice
Guidelines and Statements can
be viewed on-line on
the Kaiser Permanente Northern
California
intranet website at htt{)://clinical
'library, ca. kp. org CME
Credit: ContinumH
Education Credit for physicians
and nurses is
available for review ol Statement.
The CME Pro-
and Post-Tests are available
on-line at the
above website address. This
website is
accessible only from the Kaiser Permanente
computer network. CONTACT
INFORMATION Kaiser
Permanente
Northern California TPMG
Department of
Quality and Utilization 1800
Harrison Street,
4th floor Oakland,
CA 94612 510-987-2950
or tie-line
8-427-2950 To
obtain more
information about KPNC Clinical Practice
Guidelines and Statements, printed copies. or permission to
reproduce any portion, please contact
the TPMG Dept. of Quality & Utilization, or
send an e-mail message
to clil.EiC.l~l.gzlidelilzes@kp.
org KPNC
Clinical Practice
Guidelines and Statements can
be viewed on-line on
the Kaiser Permanente Northern
California
intranet website at htt{)://clinical
'library, ca. kp. org CME
Credit: ContinumH
Education Credit for physicians
and nurses is
available for review ol Statement.
The CME Pro-
and Post-Tests are available
on-line at the
above website address. This
website is
accessible only from the Kaiser Permanente
computer network. The
Permanente Medical
Group (TPMG) clinical practice
guidelines and statements have been developed to assist clinicians by
providing an analytical framework
for the evaluation and treatment of selected common problems
encountered by patients. These guidelines
and statements are not intended to establish a protocol for all
patients with a particular condition.
While they provide one approach to evaluating a
problem, clinical
conditions may vary significantly from
individual to individual. Therefore, the clinician
must exercise
independent judgment and make decisions
based upon the situation presented. While great care has been
taken to assure the accuracy of the
information presented, the reader is advised that TPMG
cannot be responsible
for continued currency of the information for any errors or
omissions in this statement, or for
any consequences arising from their use. Copyripht 1999 The
Perman | |